Martina Trevisan vs Darja Semenistaja Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• On second serve performance in the last 6 months, Trevisan edges out Semenistaja slightly with 41.77% compared to 39.03%. This seems to be an important factor in predicting match outcomes.
• When analyzing return game proficiency, Trevisan again holds a small advantage on second serve returns with 51.14% success over Semenistaja's 50.87%. For first serve returns, however, Semenistaja is more effective, securing 36.88% against Trevisan's 33.33%.
• Under pressure scenarios showcase Semenistaja’s strength, having saved 44.24% of breakpoints, whereas Trevisan has managed 40%. Could this indicate an edge for Semenistaja in critical moments?
• In overall performance over the last year, Semenistaja holds a win rate of 55.95%, which is significantly higher than Trevisan’s 42.86%.
• Both players favor clay courts, with Semenistaja winning 64% of their matches and Trevisan slightly better with a 66% win rate. Both struggle on different surfaces, with Semenistaja finding it difficult on indoor hard courts and Trevisan on grass.
• In terms of professional level, Semenistaja has been more active in Challengers/ITF events, winning 60.56% of her matches, whereas Trevisan competes on the main tour, where she has a 44.44% win rate. Does this experience variance impact their competitive readiness?
• When facing opponents, Semenistaja has generally competed against those ranked around 205.82, contrasting with Trevisan battling players averaging a rank of 162.57.
• Regarding performance in deciding sets, Semenistaja shows a stronger track record with a 58% win rate, while Trevisan stands at 44% over the past year.
• Looking at break point conversions, Semenistaja again holds a slight advantage by converting 43.18% of opportunities compared to Trevisan’s 40.74%.

Editorial Prediction (July 16, 2025, UTC):

The upcoming match between Semenistaja and Trevisan presents some intriguing contrasts in form and performance statistics. Where Trevisan has slightly better recent second serve performance, Semenistaja demonstrates more resilience under pressure and excels in saving breakpoints.

Semenistaja’s significant edge in win rate over the past year suggests stronger overall performance, despite Trevisan’s familiarity with a higher competition level on the main tour. Semenistaja’s consistent performance in tie-breaking sets could also prove decisive.

Although both players excel on clay, the match could hinge on how well they adapt to pressure situations and capitalize on break point opportunities. Given the analyzed statistics, Semenistaja appears more consistent and is likely to secure victory in this matchup.